Samsung's mid-range and entry-level phones haven't been immune to the company's cost-cutting endeavors. The company has taken significant steps to cut down on costs and improve margins under the leadership of TM Roh. Those efforts have so far excluded the flagship Galaxy S series, but that may be about to change next year.
A recent report claims that TM Roh is due in China later this month where he would meet with BOE, one of the country's top display manufacturers. The agenda? Possibly finalizing a deal that would see BOE OLED panels being used for the base Galaxy S27.
There have been a few rumors already suggesting that Samsung might shift the base Galaxy S27 from Samsung Display's OLED panels to ones supplied by BOE. The reason is simple enough, they'd be cheaper and would likely not cause enough of a backlash from consumers because Samsung would stick to its own display panels for the Galaxy S27+ and the Galaxy S27 Ultra.
Flagships have remained untouched from this sort of cost-cutting before, a kind of unspoken floor below which the Galaxy S series did not go. That floor is now being tested.
There's a straightforward logic that's not unreasonable on its face. Component costs are rising across the board, and Samsung needs to protect margins without triggering another round of price increases on top of the ones it has already pushed through this year.
It's not that BOE's panels are materially worse. In all honesty, most people probably wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a Samsung Display OLED and a BOE OLED. The Chinese display maker has also made significant improvements to its display quality. What this move represents is a choice Samsung's apparently willing to make even though it could choose not to.
Samsung's semiconductor division might be making money hand over fist right now due to the AI super cycle but rewind just a few years ago to 2022-2023 and it was on shaky ground. The memory supply glut had caused prices to crash leading to a steep decline in Samsung's profits. Its foundry was finding it difficult to bring in orders and was burning billions of dollars in the process.
On the other hand, those were pretty good years for the company's mobile division. It was posting record revenues and profits, helping do much of the heavy lifting for Samsung Electronics' balance sheet. It's not that the mobile division's performance has nosedived since. The AI chip demand has just strapped a rocket to Samsung's earnings from semiconductors and shot them to outer space.
The same memory demand that's doing wonders for Samsung's semiconductor division is proving to be a nightmare for its mobile division. It's having to pay through the nose for memory supply and other components with little room to raise prices any further. Analysts already project that the mobile division could end up posting an annual loss this year.
The dynamic has essentially inverted. It can be said that the division that needed MX's support during the down cycle is now the one generating the profit and market conditions that MX finds itself a victim of. The price of the very commodity Samsung's semiconductor division is selling at record margins is what's compressing MX's own margins from the other side.
Samsung's divisions are run with real accountability for their own numbers, and there are good governance reasons not to treat one business unit's windfall as a slush fund for another's cost pressures. TM Roh's mandate is to make MX's own economics work, not to lobby a sister division for a subsidy. Holding divisions to their own performance is part of how Samsung has stayed disciplined across cycles others have stumbled through.
But discipline and strategy are not the same thing, and this decision is ultimately a strategic one. Boasting Samsung Display OLED panels exclusively has functioned as a quiet credibility marker for the Galaxy S series. Breaking it for the first time, on the base model, during a year in which Samsung Electronics as a corporation has more profit to work with than it has had in years, is a choice about what the company really values.
The outcome of TM Roh's trip to China will reveal whether it values divisional margin protection over a hit to a brand promise that took years to build but is now one move away from eroding. What's so bad about some red on the balance sheet that the conglomerate's otherwise record profits can't fix?
Post a Comment